Diskussion:Sai/Befunde

(Evtl. einiges zitierenswertes dabei:)

• Faculty of Business and Economics, Informationen "Doctoral degree"

• "HIGHER EDUCATION ACT", 1998, PDF)

• eine aktuellere Version des "HIGHER EDUCATION ACT" beinhaltet Section 47c-47g pdf

• 47c "The Proceeding at a Public Higher Education Institution concerning Statement of Invalidity of State Examinations or Their Parts or the Thesis Defence"
• 2) The Rector shall express his/her decision of invalidity of the state examinations or their parts or of the thesis defence if the person whose state examinations or their parts or whose thesis defence is concerned:

• [...]
• b) has not met or only apparently met the conditions or requirements presented by the Higher Education Act, the degree programme, and the Study and Examination Regulations for completing the state examination or its parts or the dissertation defence because of an unauthorized usage of another person’s work in gross violation of legal provisions concerning copyright protection ³²⁾ or because of another intentional activity not mentioned in a), in case of permanent or repeated violation of good manners or in such a case where the possibility of gaining standard knowledge and skills by participants of the given degree programme was significantly disturbed.

• (3) In case of failing to meet conditions for completion of state examinations or their parts or the dissertation defence in accordance with Paragraphs (2) a) and b), such case is deemed to present an objective state of discontinuity between the actual state of affairs and facts confirmed by the higher education diploma when a higher education diploma has been issued without the recipient having passed the state examinations or its parts or the thesis defence.
• (4) Proceedings for expressing the invalidity are initiated ex officio. It can be initiated by the Rector as well:

• a) at the very latest 3 years after the legal effect of the decision by which a particular person was sentenced for an intentional crime, if the case as per Paragraph (2) a) applies; or
• b) at the very latest 3 years from the date of performing the state examination or apparently performing the state examination or its last part or of the Doctoral thesis defence, if it is the case pursuant to Paragraph (2) b).

• (5) If the Rector has not found any reasons for the statement of invalidity of the thesis defence or its part in accordance with (2), proceedings for the statement of the invalidity shall be discontinued.

Für die Sekt. 47c-g kommt einiges an Text zusammen. In welchem Umfang - bzw. mit welchen Abgrenzungen/Auslassungen - sollte am sinnvollsten daraus zitiert werden? -- Schumann (Diskussion) 13:34, 11. Dez. 2020 (UTC)

• "Study and Examination Regulations of Mendel University in Brno": PDF

• Declaration of the Research Integrity Assurance Policy at Mendel University in Brno signed Brno 23/09/2019 Rector

Rector

Probably the most important period for ensuring the integrity of research occurs during the doctoral studies, when it is necessary to place particular emphasis on the following areas:

• The issue of intellectual property, including the conventions on co-authorship

• Ethical aspects and the definition of misconduct in research

If not done previously, it is necessary for the doctoral candidates to become familiar with the standards and guidelines regarding professional conduct, ethics, plagiarism and proper use of citations and be aware of the importance of the explicit recognition of the work of others. It is no less important to record information and data related to research, which shall be carried out in accordance with the best practices in the relevant scientific field.

Graduates of doctoral programmes must specifically know and apply in their research the principles of ethical conduct of research and the best research practices, including the correct attribution of merit and authorship and avoidance of misconduct in research.

With regard to the above, we are determined to strengthen our efforts to educate students and employees regarding principles and procedures that underpin the integrity of research.

---

Gutachten:

• Assoc. prof. Helena Chládková, Ph.D.: Supervisor´s evaluation of the study and dissertation thesis of [Sai], M. Sc. (PDF)

• "The aim of the thesis is clearly defined, the methodology correspondents to the stated objective. Used methodology is very suitable. S[..] used relevant scientific resources in the theoretical part of her thesis. Results and findings are interesting, selected methods are used in correct way. The elaborated dissertation proves her good ability to acquire information, including scientific literature, internet and own experience."

• doc. Ing. Milan Palát, Ph.D.: Opponent review of dissertation thesis (PDF)

• "The dissertation thesis is based on a sufficient literature survey and relevant research data. The literature sources cited in this thesis prove a satisfactory orientation in the given research area. However, the chapter Theoretical foundation often mixes theoretical and practical aspects of the given research area." (p. [1])

• "[...] some headings in presented tables remained in German language." (p. [2])

• "From the formal point of view, the thesis reaches the required level with an exception of low quality charts and tables, small typing errors and some German headings." (p. [2])

• "[...] fulfils elementary requirements on dissertations of a doctoral study programme." (p. [2])

• "The author proved a capability of independent research and the dissertation thesis represents certain contribution to theory, practice and education." (p. [3])

• doc. Ing. Martina Fejfarová, Ph.D.: Reviewers Report (PDF)

• "The list of references seems to be made according to the Harvard referencing style but there some mistakes." (p. 1)

• "Although the author has managed to summarize the theoretical background relatively well, I recommend to better deduce the main objective of the dissertation from the theoretical background. The main objective is not clearly defined." (p. 1)

• "There are some typing mistakes and mistakes in used referencing style. All figures and tables should be in the English language." (p. 3)

• "[Conclusion:] The submitted dissertation is processed on a very good professional level. The author demonstrated orientation in the chosen issue and the ability to undertake independent scientific work. The content and scope of the dissertation correspond to the requirements for the dissertation." (p. 4)

• doc. Ing. Lea Kubíčková, PhD.: Opponent Review of Dissertation Thesis (PDF)

• "After reading the thesis I honestly cannot say that the author would close scientific gaps, I can see rather practical benefits in the dissertation. [...] Overall, however, it is necessary to say that the aim of the work is not clearly and factually defined and after reading 3 pages of the text, I am not able to clearly determine what the main aim of this work is.
  Literature review uses very old resources, the author begins the chapter with citations from 1983 and 1984." (p. [1])

• "To sum it up - literary research contains many sources, many of them are obsolete, some parts of literary research do not have a direct link to the stated goal." (p. [2])

• "Let me comment on the tables in Chapter 5 - it is not good that they are not translated from German when the work is written in English.
  In terms of form, I would point out that in this chapter there are plenty of pictures (some of the pictures should have been included in the attachment,) unnecessarily large charts and tables, as well as half-empty pages. In total, 20 half-empty pages do not give me a sufficient range of dissertation results." (p. [2])

• "Formally, I would recommend the author to correct English - the work contains a lot of typing errors and grammatical errors (even in the titles of the chapters, e.g. title of chap. 3.1, as mentioned above)." (p. [3])

• "Although the thesis is from my point of view weak and at a relatively low level, the work meets the main requirements for similar type of work and
  I recommend work for the defense
  and after successful defense I propose to award academic title Doctor (Ph.D.)." (p. [3])

---

Page	#Sources
001	3
005	3
031	3
002	2
003	2
004	2
014	2
017	2
023	2
024	2
030	2
032	2
033	2
039	2