Diss[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Übersicht: Symbole (Häkchen)[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

✔️ liegt vor
(✔️) in Bearbeitung
❌ TO DO: Drohne/Bot - Bibojob
✅ fragmentiert - DONE - fettich!
(Z) Zitat

TO DO: "weiße Stellen"[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

001, 002, 005, 007, 008, 009, 011, 016, 017, 018, 026, 027, 028, 030, 031, 033, 035, 036, 037, 038, 042, 043, 047, 049, 051, 052, 054, 055, 056, 079 (WP), 080 (WP), 115 (WP), 142, 143, 146, 168, 170, 177, 178, 179, 186, 187, 190, 191, 192, 193, 198, 199, 200, 203, 206, 214, 215, 216, 217, 221, 225, 238, 240, 247, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 258, 259, 262, 263, 264, 266, 267, 268, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 285, 286, 287, 296, 304

Quellen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Wikipedia (WP)[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Dissertationen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  • ✔️ Holmström 1996 BOT (ungeprüft): 019, 020, 021, 302, 303
  • ✔️ Philbin 2005 BOT (ungeprüft): 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 181,182, 183, 184, 185

Master's Thesis[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Misc[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]


(Noch) NICHT verfügbar[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]


Verfügbar und Quellen angelegt[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  • ✔️ Robert L. Heath: Handbook of Public Relations, 2001 (Sammelband)
    BOT (ungeprüft): 006, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 029, 103, 105, 106, 188, 189, 192, 207, 213, 215, 216, 241, 246, 284
  • ✔️ Robinson Bessell 2002a (Sammelband) - (OCR) liegt vor BOT: (ungeprüft) Dsi, S. 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 147, 148, 175, 176, 281, 282
  • Laura A. Wackwitz / Lana F. Rakow 2004 (Aufsatzsammlung) GB
  • ✔️ Krishnamurthy Sriramesh - 2004 - Public Relations in Asia: An Anthology BOT (ungeprüft!):
    018, 035, 036, 037, 038, 039, 040, 041, 042, 044, 045, 046, 047, 048, 050, 052, 053, 054, 170, 177, 250, 262, 302
    • ✔️ Sriramesh 2004 (Preface): 053, 302
    • ✔️ Ananto 2004: BOT (ungeprüft!): 035, 036, 037, 038, 039, 040, 041, 042, 044, 045, 046, 047, 048, 050, 052, 170, 262

Verfügbar, noch keine Quellen angelegt[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]


Hidden Links[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Zahlreiche hidden links (en.wikipedia.org, www.answers.com, emeraldinsight.com)

Hauptext:

S. 10, 34, 74, 75, 79, 80, 95, 96, 115, 201, 202, 205, 230, 231, 243, 244, 245

LV:

S. 310, 322, 327

en.wikipedia.org[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

www.answers.com[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

emeraldinsight.com[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

faculty.law.ubc.ca[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  • 310

web.archive[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  • 322

links.jstor.org[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  • 327

Zitate aus Interviews und "Mailing List Discussion"[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Dsi Chapter 6 Interviews Mailing List Discussion2.png

Chapter VI, Results (187-278)

189, 190, 192, 193, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 238, 239, 240, 247, 248, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277

DPL-Übersicht: Fragmente und Quellen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Ch. p_s p_e #p
1 INTRODUCTION 1 17 17
2 THE PUBLIC RELATIONS INDUSTRY IN INDONESIA 18 56 39
3 GENDER COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC RELATIONS 57 119 63
4 WOMEN IN INDONESIA 120 149 30
5 METHODOLOGY 150 186 37
6 RESULTS 187 278 92
7 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION 279 304 26

Fragmente (DPL)[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Dubletten, S.:

073 17 074 01 075 01

3 Fragmente

Angelegte Quellen / Fragmente - gesichtet und ungesichtet (DPL)[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Nr. Quelle ÜP KP VS BO KW Unfer Frag
Dubl
1. Zulminarni 2001   2   2     4  
2. Parawansa 2002   1 1 4   6 6  
3. Sen 2002       3   1 3  
4. Sadli 2002       2   2 2  
5. Robinson Bessell 2002     1       1  
6. Cameron 2002     6 2   8 8  
7. Hugo 2002       2   2 2  
8. Jones 2002       3   3 3  
9. Wu 2006   1 2       3  
10. Oey-Gardiner 2002       2   2 2  
11. Robinson Bessell 2002a     2     2 2  
12. Wackwitz Rakow 2004     2 7   9 9  
13. Kark 2004   1 3     4 4  
14. Toth 2001   1 7 2   10 10  
15. Heath 2001       2   2 2  
16. Hutchins 2001     1     1 1  
17. Metzler 2001       1   1 1  
18. Rakow Wackwitz 2004   1   2   2 3  
19. Wikipedia Suharto 2008     1       1  
20. Clark 2006     1       1  
21. Holmström 1996     5     1 5  
22. Rakow Wackwitz 2004a     3 1   4 4  
23. Kent Taylor Turcilo 2006   2       2 2  
24. Rakow Wackwitz 2004b       1   1 1  
25. de Lauretis 1987     1       1  
26. van Ruler de Lange 2003     6 2     8  
27. Verčič Grunig Grunig 1996       1   1 1  
28. Golitsinski 2007     2     2 2  
29. Ryan Haslam 2005   2 3     5 5  
30. Scrimger 2001     1       1  
31. Wotschack Wittek 2006   1 7     8 8  
32. Ivy Backlund 2004   3 29 2   27 34  
33. McElreath 1993     2     2 2  
34. Cuadrado Morales Recio 2008   1 2     3 3  
35. Budianta 2000       2   2 2  
36. Blackburn 2001       5   5 5  
37. Hoofd 1997       2   2 2  
38. Fröhlich 2004       3   3 3  
39. Wikipedia Liberal Feminism 2007   2 1       3  
40. Wikipedia Feminism 2007     3       3  
41. Ananto 2004     1 7   8 8  
42. Sriramesh 2004     2     2 2  
43. Grunig Toth Hon 2001     15 1   16 16  
44. Serini Toth Wright Emig 1998     3 2   5 5  
45. O'Neil 2003     4 3   4 7  
46. Philbin 2005   10 13     14 23  
47. Fröhlich Peters 2007   1 5     6 6  
48. Macrine 2004     1     1 1  
49. Novak 2002     1     1 1  
50. McNamara 2000       1   1 1  
51. Martin 1991     1     1 1  
52. Toussaint 1993     3       3  
53. Wikipedia Gerwani 2007     3     3 3  
54. Wikipedia Patriarchy 2008     4     4 4  
55. Wikipedia Glass ceiling 2006     3       3  
56. Wikipedia Feminism 2007a         3 3 3 3
57. Plowman 1998                
58. Hanitzsch 2005       1   1 1  
59. Wrigley 2002     28 3   26 31  

  • Aufsatz (Sammelband)
  • Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
  • Buchbesprechung
  • Dissertation
  • Master's Thesis
  • Monographie
  • Wikipedia
  • Working/Discussion Paper

Crazy quilting[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]




S      #Q
 88	4
231	4
 96	3
108	3
157	3
302	3

Wiederholungen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Dsi-Selbstvergleich[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Großformat

Dsi Selbstvergleich Graphviz.svg

Beispiel: Man kopiere die Seiten 060 und 172 in den "Vergleicher" ...

L Umfang % R Umfang % L Seite R Seite
95 50 95 33 018 016
33 12 33 11 025 003
91 34 91 31 027 003
47 17 47 19 030 011
26 9 26 10 048 040
46 18 46 16 057 016
26 10 26 10 119 011
64 28 64 22 120 016
29 12 29 20 120 017
66 21 66 24 148 124
32 11 32 11 151 002
30 10 30 10 157 086
96 37 96 36 168 022
26 10 26 9 168 162
76 26 76 27 169 032
56 20 56 21 170 038
70 26 70 25 170 043
88 28 88 31 171 059
140 48 140 54 172 060
27 10 27 10 173 104
31 10 31 10 174 107
39 13 39 15 175 123
63 22 63 24 175 125
33 11 33 12 175 128
36 12 36 13 175 129
59 21 59 20 175 147
47 16 47 16 176 016
41 14 41 17 176 120
29 10 29 12 188 011
31 11 31 12 188 158
51 16 51 18 189 105
79 28 79 30 192 106
59 21 59 20 194 005
69 25 69 33 194 098
26 9 26 8 207 103
35 13 35 12 212 005
78 29 78 30 216 106
75 28 75 26 216 192
41 14 41 15 221 208
42 16 42 15 224 008
99 39 99 37 225 008
29 10 29 11 234 231
27 11 27 9 235 074
37 13 37 12 237 111
28 11 28 11 238 110
49 20 49 17 238 111
105 33 105 36 239 111
127 45 127 43 240 193
40 14 40 15 241 006
44 16 44 16 248 004
82 30 82 30 248 113
48 20 48 17 249 113
58 23 58 19 250 193
55 22 55 19 250 240
41 14 41 16 262 046
96 32 96 32 262 047
40 15 40 14 270 185
26 17 26 9 278 002
31 16 31 11 279 055
38 19 38 13 279 177
27 10 27 9 280 054
72 29 72 27 280 115
25 10 25 9 280 116
48 19 48 16 280 117
151 58 151 58 281 146
82 32 82 28 281 147
59 23 59 21 281 175
44 16 44 16 282 124
111 41 111 36 282 148
86 31 86 33 282 149
34 14 34 11 283 189
57 21 57 20 284 215
83 30 83 27 284 277
37 16 37 14 285 216
40 17 40 16 285 238
74 27 74 29 286 250
54 19 54 17 286 277
25 9 25 9 286 284
29 9 29 14 288 195
32 10 32 11 290 007
87 31 87 31 294 084
48 17 48 18 294 085
53 20 53 17 295 087
63 22 63 22 299 117
92 38 92 33 301 014
83 33 83 30 302 055

Literaturverzeichnis[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  • LV/References: S. 305-336: 306 Einträge
    • hidden links: S. 310, 322, 327

Doppelt aufgeführte Quellen (Duplos)[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  • Grunig, L., Toth, E., & Hon, L. (2001). Women in public relations: How gender influences practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Hon., L., Grunig, L., & Toth, E. (2001). Women in public relations: How gender influences practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

Siehe Dsi/Fragment 107 08, Dsi/Fragment 174 01


  • Ton, R. (1998). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Tong, R. P. (1998). Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

...

Im Haupttext referenzierte, aber im Literaturverzeichnis nicht aufgeführte Titel[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  1. (Ananto, 2004) -> Ananto, 2003?
  2. Bem (1983) [BINGO! aus: GenderSpeak: Personal Effectiveness in Gender Communication, S. 77?]
  3. Bem (1993) [BINGO! aus: GenderSpeak: Personal Effectiveness in Gender Communication, S. 82?]
  4. Bem, 1987 [BINGO! aus: GenderSpeak: Personal Effectiveness in Gender Communication, S. 82?]
  5. Berger & Bradac, 1982 [BINGO! aus: GenderSpeak: Personal Effectiveness in Gender Communication]
  6. Berger & Calabrese, 1975 [BINGO! aus: GenderSpeak: Personal Effectiveness in Gender Communication]
  7. (Grunig, 2006)
  8. Guba and Lincoln (1994) [Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research, in: Denzin/Lincoln 1994] [ohne Befund]
  9. hooks (2000) - Feminism is for Everybody (2000) - Internet Archive [ohne Befund]
    [BINGO! aus: GenderSpeak: Personal Effectiveness in Gender Communication, S. 39?]
  10. (Hoofd, 1997) [mit Befund, BO]
  11. (Ruler et al., 2000) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259672052_The_European_body_of_knowledge_on_public_relations_communication_management_The_report_of_the_delphi_research_project_2000[ohne Befund]
  12. Walter Mischel (1966)
  13. Albert Bandura (1971; 1986)
  14. Peach, 1998
  15. Kohlberg (1966)
  16. Kohlberg (1996)
  17. (Pleck, 1977)
  18. Pleck (1975)
  19. ...

Im Literaturverzeichnis aufgeführte, aber im Haupttext nicht referenzierte Titel[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

  1. Almatsier, R. (2001). Indonesia’s struggling image. IPRA Frontline. Retrieved August 1, 2003, from http://ipranet.org.f10601/p22-23.pdf
  2. Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research. 9th edition. Wadsworth / Thomson Learning. Belmont, CA.
  3. Chunn, D. E. (2007). Book Review: Paul Nathanson and Katherine K. Young, Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men. Canadian Journal of Family Law 23 (1): 93-103.
  4. Clark, H. (2006). Are Women Happy Under the Glass Ceiling? Retrieved May 20, 2008, from http://www.forbes.com/2006/03/07/glass-ceiling-opportunities--cx_hc_0308glass.html [mit BEFUND: S. 265 f.] Internet Archive
  5. Donato, K. M. (1990) “Keepers of the Corporate Image: Women in Public Relations.” Pp. 129-143 in B. F. Reskin and P. A. Roos (Eds.). Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. [ohne Befund]
  6. Reskin, B., & Roos, P. (1990). Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. [ohne Befund]
  7. ...

"Retrieved"[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Datum Jahr Monat Tag Datum
Retrieved September 12, 2003, 2003 09 12 2003-09-12
Retrieved August 1, 2003, 2003 08 01 2003-08-01
Retrieved August 27, 2003, 2003 08 27 2003-08-27
Retrieved July 4, 2007, 2007 07 04 2007-07-04
Retrieved July 4, 2007, 2007 07 04 2007-07-04
Retrieved September 12, 2003, 2003 09 12 2003-09-12
Retrieved May 20, 2008, 2008 05 20 2008-05-20
Retrieved October 5, 2003, 2003 10 05 2003-10-05
Retrieved September 12, 2003, 2003 09 12 2003-09-12
Retrieved November 23, 2003, 2003 11 23 2003-11-23
Retrieved August 15, 2003, 2003 08 15 2003-08-15
Retrieved on 2007-01-06. 2007 01 06 2007-01-06
Retrieved December 1, 2003, 2003 12 01 2003-12-01
Retrieved July 27, 2007 2007 07 27 2007-07-27
Retrieved May 28, 2007 2007 05 28 2007-05-28
Retrieved October 20, 2003, 2003 10 20 2003-10-20
Retrieved October 20, 2003, 2003 10 20 2003-10-20
Retrieved November 14, 2003, 2003 11 14 2003-11-14
Retrieved September 12, 2003, 2003 09 12 2003-09-12
Retrieved October 5, 2003 2003 10 05 2003-10-05
Retrieved July 15, 2007, 2007 07 15 2007-07-15
Retrieved July 4, 2007, 2007 07 04 2007-07-04
Jahr-Monat #
2003-08 3
2003-09 4
2003-10 4
2003-11 2
2003-12 1
2007-01 1
2007-05 1
2007-07 5
2008-05 1
Summe 22

Zitierfehler[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Dsi, S. 58

According to Astin and Leland (1991), leadership is “activity aimed at bringing about change in an organization or social system to improve people’s lives” (p. 7).

Astin & Leland (1991: S. 7)

Leadership manifests itself through activity aimed at bringing about change in an organization or institution or social system in order to improve people’s lives.

Dsi, S. 7 [Zitierfehler]

Fröhlich (2004, p. 67) writes that in the communication field: “'[F]emale' characteristics such as empathy, thoughtfulness, the need to reach consensus, a talent for dealing with people, and the ability to work in a team oriented atmosphere, are all considered to be qualifications that could be used as career advantages in contrast to supposedly typical male characteristics as cool rationality, competitiveness, aggression, and individualism.”

Dsi, S. 290 [Wiederholung; kein Verweis auf Fröhlich 2004] Dsi/Fragment 290 01

Supposedly female characteristics in the public relations field, such as thoughtfulness, empathy, the need to reach consensus, a talent for dealing with people, and the ability to work in a team-oriented atmosphere, are all considered to be beneficial career qualifications as opposed to the supposedly typical male characteristics such as cool rationality, competitiveness, aggression, and individualism (Aldoory & Toth, 2001).

Fröhlich (2004: S. 67)

In the fields of communication professions, “female” characteristics such as empathy, thoughtfulness, the need to reach consensus, a talent for dealing with people, and the ability to work in a team-oriented atmosphere, are all considered to be qualifications that could be used as career advantages in contrast to supposedly typical male characteristics such as cool rationality, competitiveness, aggression, and individualism (see Aldoory & Toth, 2001).

"Interesting"[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Dsi, S. 41

Due to the lack of literature on public relations industry and education in Indonesia, in this section the researcher uses several literary sources which had already served her in her 2003 master’s thesis.
M.S. Towson University 2003

Dsi, S. 152

Therefore, the researcher was no longer interested in mere numbers. It was clear that the majority of public relations practitioners in Indonesia are female. The researcher was interested in the feminization of the public relations profession and the impacts that result from it, and thus used a qualitative approach.

Dsi, S. 177

The interview questions (see Appendix) covered factors related to the glass ceiling theory and the role congruity theory.

Dsi, S. 179 f.

At the end, 35 female and 18 male public relations practitioners and educators agreed to participate in this research. These participants come from a variety of industries: Media (n=5); NGOs (n=4); PR agencies (n=16); Government (n=2); Education, both as educators and as PR practitioners in an educational institution (n=6); and Corporations, including banks, fast moving consumer goods, transportation, gas and oil, property, hotels, and insurance companies (n=20). Nevertheless, these fields often overlap.

Dsi, S. 188

The data analysis of this study used matrices with the help of computer software; however, the researcher chooses not to present the results in matrices in order to avoid the appearance of claiming generalization. Therefore, the researcher relies heavily on the important themes and personal quotes from the respondents, and emphasizes that these findings only pertain to this specific study and these specific respondents. The researcher claims no statistical generalizability of the findings.

"The researcher ..."[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Ausgewählte Beispiele

Weitere Arbeiten von Dsi[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

Weitere Plagiate[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten]

TO DO: sehr umfangreiche Liste

(hier zufällig ausgewählte Beispiele)

Nutzung von Community-Inhalten gemäß CC-BY-SA, sofern nicht anders angegeben.