Overview
- Problematic text parallels can be found in the following chapters (state of analysis: XXX):
- 3 Theoretical foundation 14
-
- 3.3 Demographic change and its implication of HR management 21
- 3.4 Human image of generations in working life 25
- 3.5 Specifically HR Management to increase employer attractiveness 38
- 3.5.1 The concept of personnel management 38
- 3.5.2 The term health professional 39
- 3.5.3 The concept of employer attractiveness 39
- 3.6 Influencing factors on employer attractiveness 41 – [completely]
- 4 Methodology [46]
- 4.1 Questions of research and differentiation of hypotheses 46
- 4.2 Research design and type of examination 47
- 4.3 Objective of investigation 49
- 4.4 Operationalizing the term employer attractiveness 49
- 4.4.1 Questionnaire design for recording the attractiveness factors 50
- 4.4.2 Recording of the generation differences regarding influencing factors on employer attractiveness 51
- 4.4.3 Assessment of the need for generation-specific alignment of personnel activities 52
- 4.4.4 Recording the non-fulfillment of job-related needs and resulting change intentions 52
- 4.5 Framework and approach 52
- 5 Results 57
- 5.1 Descriptive analysis of items 57
- 5.1.1 Region of workplace 57
- 5.1.2 Generation division 58
- 5.1.3 Highest level of education 60
- 5.1.4 Current position within the organisation 62
- 5.1.5 Relevant work experience 64
- 5.1.6 Size of organisation 65
- 5.1.7 Least bearable situation 67
- 5.2 Descriptive analysis of dependent and independent variables [68]
- 5.3 Aggregation of data 75
- 5.3.1 Description of the scale values 75
- 5.3.2 Factor analysis 75
- 5.3.3 Summary of the desired employer Generation Y 77
- 5.4 Inferential statistic analysis: Results of research on basis of hypotheses 79
- 6 Discussion of findings [88]
- 6.1 Discussion of generation specific orientation of personnel management 88
- 6.2 Discussion of employer attractiveness from the point of view of the preferable Generation Y [89]
- 6.3 Discussion of the desired profile of a Generation Y employer of choice [89]
- 6.4 Recommendations [90]
- 6.5 Contributions to Theory [93]
- 6.6 Contributions to Managerial Practice [94]
- 6.7 Contributions to Pedagogical Practice [95]
- 6.8 Limitations and suggestions for future research 95, 96
- 7 Conclusion [98].
Prominent findings
- Over XX% of the pages of the dissertation's main text contain plagiarized passages. Over XXX of the main text is translated almost verbatim from around XXX different sources. These sources are mostly available on the open internet, generally without any or the proper reference.
- The plagiarized passages often consist of whole paragraphs. Numerous entire pages and even complete sections of the thesis are taken from just one source.
- Entire pages taken from a single source can be found on the pages: 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 56
- Examples of complete sections taken from a single source:
- Section "3.4.2.1 Veterans" on page 30 is translated word-for-word from a bachelor thesis,Wagner 2015, without any reference.
- Section 3.6 (including subsections 3.6.1 and 3.6.2) extending from page 41 to 45 is taken from Ruthus 2013.
Source issues
- Ruthus (2013): (Ruthus, 2013), the source text for large parts of this thesis, is mentioned several times within the thesis. However. it is not identified as the central source text for this comprehensive translation process.
- Out of XX sources identified for documented text parallels, XX of them are not mentioned in the thesis at all.
- There are several phantom references, in-text references that are not elaborated in the reference section.
See, for example, the following documented text sections, which include 'phantom references':
- Fragment 034 01: (Iyengar & Lepper, 2000), (IBE, 2013)
- Fragment 037 01: (Meinert, 2010), (Wang, 2010)
- Fragment 038 03: (Klaffke 2011)
- Fragment 042 01: (Drumm, 2008).
- There are some in-text references found in the text of the dissertation that do not actually correspond with what is being asserted in the previous sentence or paragraph. These can be referred to as garnish references, they are used to give the impression of scholarship without correctly attributing a statement or summary to the true source. See, for example, the following documented text sections:
- Fragment 001 02 is referenced as coming from (Institute of German Economic, 2016) (available online). None of the information given in the documented sentence can be taken from there. The beginning of the sentence is translated word-for-word from iwd.de 2017, the sentence was shortend a little in the end compared to the actual source.
- Fragment 030 22: One sentece is referenced as coming from (Watkins, 2012). While (Watkins, 2012) deals with a related topic, the information given in this sentence is not found there, the text is, however, an alomost verbatim translation of the text found in(Ruthus, 2013).
- Fragment 031 20: This section is referenced as coming from (Nagy et al., 2017). Even though (Nagy et al., 2017) deals with a related topic and some of the information given in the section might be derrived from there it is very clear that the text is taken from Wikipedia Generation Z 2016 almost verbatim.
Other observations
- ...
- According to the supervisor's evaluation paper (PDF) the author "started her PH.D. studies in 2017 in the part-time of studies".
Critical reception by the thesis supervisor and the opponents
Since the reviews of the supervisor of the doctoral thesis and of the three opponents were also published online, this allows to cite their critical comments and overall evaluations:
- Assoc. prof. Helena Chládková, Ph.D.: Supervisor´s evaluation of the study and dissertation thesis of S[..] A[..], M. Sc. (2020-01-02) (PDF)
- "The aim of the thesis is clearly defined, the methodology correspondents to the stated objective. Used methodology is very suitable. S[..] used relevant scientific resources in the theoretical part of her thesis. Results and findings are interesting, selected methods are used in correct way. The elaborated dissertation proves her good ability to acquire information, including scientific literature, internet and own experience."
- "S[..] is a very diligent and hardworking student. During her studies she published five papers, where she presenters the results of her research."
- doc. Ing. Milan Palát, Ph.D.: Opponent review of dissertation thesis (2020-02-14) (PDF)
- "The dissertation thesis is based on a sufficient literature survey and relevant research data. The literature sources cited in this thesis prove a satisfactory orientation in the given research area. However, the chapter Theoretical foundation often mixes theoretical and practical aspects of the given research area." (p. [1])
- "[...] some headings in presented tables remained in German language." (p. [2])
- "From the formal point of view, the thesis reaches the required level with an exception of low quality charts and tables, small typing errors and some German headings." (p. [2])
- "[...] fulfils elementary requirements on dissertations of a doctoral study programme." (p. [2])
- "The author proved a capability of independent research and the dissertation thesis represents certain contribution to theory, practice and education." (p. [3])
- doc. Ing. Martina Fejfarová, Ph.D.: Reviewers Report (2020-01-24) (PDF)
- "The list of references seems to be made according to the Harvard referencing style but there some mistakes." (p. 1)
- "Although the author has managed to summarize the theoretical background relatively well, I recommend to better deduce the main objective of the dissertation from the theoretical background. The main objective is not clearly defined." (p. 1)
- "There are some typing mistakes and mistakes in used referencing style. All figures and tables should be in the English language." (p. 3)
- "[Conclusion:] The submitted dissertation is processed on a very good professional level. The author demonstrated orientation in the chosen issue and the ability to undertake independent scientific work. The content and scope of the dissertation correspond to the requirements for the dissertation." (p. 4)
- doc. Ing. Lea Kubíčková, PhD.: Opponent Review of Dissertation Thesis (2020-01-20) (PDF)
- "After reading the thesis I honestly cannot say that the author would close scientific gaps, I can see rather practical benefits in the dissertation. [...] Overall, however, it is necessary to say that the aim of the work is not clearly and factually defined and after reading 3 pages of the text, I am not able to clearly determine what the main aim of this work is.
Literature review uses very old resources, the author begins the chapter with citations from 1983 and 1984." (p. [1])
- "After reading the thesis I honestly cannot say that the author would close scientific gaps, I can see rather practical benefits in the dissertation. [...] Overall, however, it is necessary to say that the aim of the work is not clearly and factually defined and after reading 3 pages of the text, I am not able to clearly determine what the main aim of this work is.
- "To sum it up - literary research contains many sources, many of them are obsolete, some parts of literary research do not have a direct link to the stated goal." (p. [2])
- "Let me comment on the tables in Chapter 5 - it is not good that they are not translated from German when the work is written in English.
In terms of form, I would point out that in this chapter there are plenty of pictures (some of the pictures should have been included in the attachment,) unnecessarily large charts and tables, as well as half-empty pages. In total, 20 half-empty pages do not give me a sufficient range of dissertation results." (p. [2])
- "Let me comment on the tables in Chapter 5 - it is not good that they are not translated from German when the work is written in English.
- "Formally, I would recommend the author to correct English - the work contains a lot of typing errors and grammatical errors (even in the titles of the chapters, e.g. title of chap. 3.1, as mentioned above)." (p. [3])
- "Although the thesis is from my point of view weak and at a relatively low level, the work meets the main requirements for similar type of work and
I recommend work for the defense
and after successful defense I propose to award academic title Doctor (Ph.D.)." (p. [3])
- "Although the thesis is from my point of view weak and at a relatively low level, the work meets the main requirements for similar type of work and
Declaration, Regulations
- In the "Statutory declaration" (p. V), the author states:
"Herewith I declare that I have written my final thesis: [...] by myself and all sources and data used are quoted in the list of references."
- The "Study and Examination Regulations of Mendel University in Brno" (PDF) valid at the time of submission specify:
- Article 24
Doctoral study program
"(1) Doctoral study programmes are, pursuant to Section 47 of the Act, focused on scientific research and independent creative activity in the fields of research or development or on independent theoretical and creative activity in the arts."
- Article 24
- Article 33
State doctoral examinations
"(1) The state doctoral examinations verify the ability and readiness for independent activity in the field of research or development or for independent theoretical and creative activities in the arts."
- Article 33
- Article 34
Dissertation
"(1) A dissertation must include original and published results or results received for publication."
- Article 34
- [...]
- The "Declaration on Ensuring Research Integrity at Mendel University Brno" dated 23. September 2019, signed by the rector, states (PDF):
- "Probably the most important period for ensuring the integrity of research occurs during the doctoral studies, when it is necessary to place particular emphasis on the following areas:
• The issue of intellectual property, including the conventions on co-authorship
• Ethical aspects and the definition of misconduct in research
If not done previously, it is necessary for the doctoral candidates to become familiar with the standards and guidelines regarding professional conduct, ethics, plagiarism and proper use of citations and be aware of the importance of the explicit recognition of the work of others. It is no less important to record information and data related to research, which shall be carried out in accordance with the best practices in the relevant scientific field.
Graduates of doctoral programmes must specifically know and apply in their research the principles of ethical conduct of research and the best research practices, including the correct attribution of merit and authorship and avoidance of misconduct in research.
With regard to the above, we are determined to strengthen our efforts to educate students and employees regarding principles and procedures that underpin the integrity of research." (p. 3)
- "Probably the most important period for ensuring the integrity of research occurs during the doctoral studies, when it is necessary to place particular emphasis on the following areas:
Published papers [?]
- [S01-S04]
Statistics
- Currently there are 92 reviewed fragments documented that are considered to be violations of citation rules. For 73 of them there is no reference given to the source used („Übersetzungsplagiate“, „Verschleierungen“ and „Komplettplagiate“). For 19 fragments the source is given, but the extent of the used text is not made clear („Bauernopfer“).
- The publication has 99 pages that have been analyzed. On a total of 73 of these pages violations of citation rules have been documented. This represents a percentage of 73.7%. The 99 analyzed pages break down with respect to the amount of text parallels encountered as follows:
- From these statistics an extrapolation of the amount of text of the publication under investigation that has been documented as problematic can be estimated (conservatively) as about 42% of the main part of the publication.
- In all, text was taken from 22 sources.
Illustration
The following chart illustrates the amount and the distribution of the text parallel findings. The colours show the type of plagiarism diagnosed:
- [...]
(state of analysis: XXX)