VroniPlag Wiki
Assessing the Impact of XML/EDI with Real Option Valuation

von Dr. Shermin Voshmgir

vorherige Seite | zur Übersichtsseite | folgende Seite

Statistik und Sichtungsnachweis dieser Seite findet sich am Artikelende

[1.] Svr/Fragment 042 01 - Diskussion
Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2020-05-21 20:34:44 [[Benutzer:|]]
BauernOpfer, Fragment, Gesichtet, Parfett 1992, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Svr

Typus
BauernOpfer
Bearbeiter
SleepyHollow02
Gesichtet
Yes.png
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 42, Zeilen: 1-5, 14-19
Quelle: Parfett 1992
Seite(n): 14, 19, Zeilen: 14: 19 ff.; 19: 29 ff.
[EDI facilitates the adoption of these JIT techniques by providing the timely and] accurate information required on a daily basis, whilst promoting the trust and commitment required on a long-term basis (Parfett 1992: 14).

Higher bargaining power: In a highly competitive market, EDI can be useful as it provides the ability to offer significant cuts in product delivery time, which may be the difference between winning and loosing a contract. (Parfett 1992: 14).

[...]

3.3.1 Limited number of standard EDI documents defined

The development of EDI standards is crucial to the widespread adoption of this form of trading. The foundations to a truly international set of documents standards have been laid in the form of the EDIFACT syntax standard. However, the number of fully approved EDIFACT messages is still small and proprietary subsets or even supersets are often used (Parfett 1992: 19).

EDI facilitates the adoption of these JIT techniques by providing the timely and accurate information required on a daily basis, whilst promoting the trust and commitment required on a long-term basis. [...]

Terms of trade dictated by bargaining power

In a highly competitive market, EDI can be a powerful weapon in a company’s corporate armoury. The ability to offer significant cuts in product delivery time may be the difference between winning and losing a contract.

[page 19]

- Limited number of standard EDI documents defined.

The development of EDI standards is crucial to the widespread adoption of this form of trading. The foundations to a truly international set of document standards have been laid in the form of the EDIFACT syntax standard. However, as at the spring of 1991 the number of fully approved EDIFACT messages was still small and proprietary sub-sets or even super-sets are often used.
Anmerkungen

The source is given three times, but no quotation marks are used.

Sichter
(SleepyHollow02) Schumann


[2.] Svr/Fragment 042 07 - Diskussion
Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2020-03-17 21:34:05 [[Benutzer:|]]
Fragment, Gesichtet, KomplettPlagiat, Norman 1999, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Svr

Typus
KomplettPlagiat
Bearbeiter
Schumann
Gesichtet
Yes.png
Untersuchte Arbeit:
Seite: 42, Zeilen: 7-9, 20-30
Quelle: Norman 1999
Seite(n): 44, Zeilen: 15 ff.
[3.3. Barriers for EDI penetration]

One of the major problems with the current implementations of EDI is that they often require a unique solution for each pair of trading partners, making EDI costly and time-consuming to implement. [...]

[3.3.1 Limited number of standard EDI documents defined]

[...]

Another problem with traditional EDI is that it is based on the use of rigid transaction sets with business rules embedded in them. These transaction sets are defined by standards bodies such as the United Nations Standards Messages Directory for Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce, and Transport (UN/EDIFACT) and American National Standards Institute’s Accredited Standards Committee X12 sub-group (ANSI X12). Transaction sets define the fields, the order of these fields, and the length of the fields. Along with these transactions sets there are business rules, which in EDI-language are referred to as implementation guidelines (United Nations 1999 and ASC12 1999).

A fixed transaction set prevents companies from evolving by adding new services and products or changing business processes. The bodies that make the standard [transaction sets are ill equipped to keep up with the rapid pace of change in the various business environments they impact.]


ASC12 (eds). 1996, Data International Standards Association (DISA), [Online]. Available: http://polaris.disa.org/
Accessed 15 May 1999.

United Nations, Rules for Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce, and Transport (EDIFACT), [Online]. Available: http://www.unece.org/trade/untdid/welcom1.htm
Accessed: 14 May 1999.

One of the major problems with the current implementations of EDI is that they often require a unique solution for each pair of trading partners, making EDI costly and time-consuming to implement.

Another problem with traditional EDI is that it is based on the use of rigid transaction sets with business rules embedded in them. These transaction sets are defined by standards bodies such as the United Nations Standards Messages Directory for Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce, and Transport (UN/EDIFACT) [30] and American National Standards Institute’s Accredited Standards Committee X12 sub-group (ANSI X12) [32]. Transaction sets define the fields, the order of these fields, and the length of the fields. Along with these transactions sets are business rules, which in EDI-language are referred to as “implementation guidelines”.

[...]

A fixed transaction set prevents companies from evolving by adding new services and products or changing business processes. The bodies that make the standard transaction sets are ill equipped to keep up with the rapid pace of change in the various business environments they impact.


[30] Rules for Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce, and Transport (EDIFACT)
United Nations
http://www.unece.org/trade/untdid/welcom1.htm

[32] Data International Standards Association (DISA)
Accredited Standards Committee X12 (ASC12)
http://polaris.disa.org/

Anmerkungen

The actual source is not given.

Sichter
(Schumann), WiseWoman



vorherige Seite | zur Übersichtsseite | folgende Seite
Letzte Bearbeitung dieser Seite: durch Benutzer:Schumann, Zeitstempel: 20200218201812