von Weizhong Yi
Statistik und Sichtungsnachweis dieser Seite findet sich am Artikelende
| [1.] Wy/Fragment 152 09 - Diskussion Zuletzt bearbeitet: 2013-09-11 21:12:56 Hindemith | BauernOpfer, Fragment, Gesichtet, SMWFragment, Schutzlevel sysop, Wright 2007, Wy |
|
|
|
| Untersuchte Arbeit: Seite: 152, Zeilen: 9-22 |
Quelle: Wright 2007 Seite(n): 25, Zeilen: 9ff |
|---|---|
| 12.1 The Changes of Discharging Responsibilities’ Way
The way in which parliaments and parliamentarians discharge their responsibilities is also likely to be relevant to developments in relation to privilege. The issue of misuse of privilege, ether [sic!] by members or by others such as committee witnesses, may continue to receive attention. Modern technology assists greatly in the dissemination of details of parliamentary activities. There are many positive aspects in this:473 The wider community is informed more easily and more quickly of parliament’s work. One negative aspect is however that greater damage can be done because a false or reckless attack or the publication of personal details is also carried quickly and to a much wider audience, and false or unreasonably damaging published electronically can continue to “live” in databases and systems even if it is withdrawn or corrected. An awareness of such risks has already caused House committees to consider carefully the publication of submissions — in some cases, for example, certain details have been omitted, the [committees seeking to balance the interests of openness and accountability with the interests of individuals.]
473 Bernard Wright, Patterns of Change-Parliamentary Privilege, http://www.aph.gov.au/HOUSE/ PUBS/occpub/privileges.pd. |
8.4 The way in which parliaments and parliamentarians discharge their responsibilities is also likely to be relevant to developments in relation to privilege. The issue of misuse of privilege, whether by members or by others such as committee witnesses, may continue to receive attention. Modern technology assists greatly in the dissemination of details of parliamentary activities. There are many positive aspects in this: the wider community is informed more easily and more quickly of parliament’s work. One negative aspect is however that greater damage can be done because a false or reckless attack or the publication of personal details is also carried quickly and to a much wider audience, and false or unreasonably damaging published electronically can continue to ‘live’ in databases and systems even if it is withdrawn or corrected. An awareness of such risks has already caused House committees to consider carefully the publication of submissions — in some cases, for example, certain details have been omitted, the committees seeking to balance the interests of openness and accountability with the interests of individuals. |
Quelle ist in Fn. 473 genannt. Umfang und Wortlautnähe der Übernahme werden nicht ersichtlich. |
|
Letzte Bearbeitung dieser Seite: durch Benutzer:Hindemith, Zeitstempel: 20130911211335